Yes sir! I think politicians take such extreme stances to counter their opponents, not because they actually have conviction in what they're advocating for. For example, VP Vance's opponents are generally pro-choice, which fundamentally means pro-death. Why? Because "choice" is not the opposite of "life."
I believe that in his heart, Vance knows that glorifying God is the highest calling, but he might speak as if having children is the highest calling because this narrative is a direct counter to the pro-choice narrative. If his opponents would instead advocate for rebellion against God, then I bet Vance would adjust his narrative to something like "obey God."
Yes sir! I think politicians take such extreme stances to counter their opponents, not because they actually have conviction in what they're advocating for. For example, VP Vance's opponents are generally pro-choice, which fundamentally means pro-death. Why? Because "choice" is not the opposite of "life."
I believe that in his heart, Vance knows that glorifying God is the highest calling, but he might speak as if having children is the highest calling because this narrative is a direct counter to the pro-choice narrative. If his opponents would instead advocate for rebellion against God, then I bet Vance would adjust his narrative to something like "obey God."
Anyway, I enjoyed this one!
Thank you sir. And I totally agree with you!